The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Joakim Pagels

Joakim Pagels

Senior Lecturer

Portrait of Joakim Pagels

Indoor PM2.5 from occupied residences in Sweden caused higher inflammation in mice compared to outdoor PM2.5

Author

  • Aneta Wierzbicka
  • Yuliya Omelekhina
  • Anne Thoustrup Saber
  • Erica Bloom
  • Louise Gren
  • Sarah Søs Poulsen
  • Bo Strandberg
  • Joakim Pagels
  • Nicklas Raun Jacobsen

Summary, in English

We spend most of our time indoors; however, little is known about the effects of exposure to aerosol particles indoors. We aimed to determine differences in relative toxicity and physicochemical properties of PM
2.5 collected simultaneously indoors (PM
2.5 INDOOR ) and outdoors (PM
2.5 OUTDOOR ) in 15 occupied homes in southern Sweden. Collected particles were extracted from filters, pooled (indoor and outdoor separately), and characterized for chemical composition and endotoxins before being tested for toxicity in mice via intratracheal instillation. Various endpoints including lung inflammation, genotoxicity, and acute-phase response in lung and liver were assessed 1, 3, and 28 days post-exposure. Chemical composition of particles used in toxicological assessment was compared to particles analyzed without extraction. Time-resolved particle mass and number concentrations were monitored. PM
2.5 INDOOR showed higher relative concentrations (μg mg
-1 ) of metals, PAHs, and endotoxins compared to PM
2.5 OUTDOOR . These differences may be linked to PM
2.5 INDOOR causing significantly higher lung inflammation and lung acute-phase response 1 day post-exposure compared to PM
2.5 OUTDOOR and vehicle controls, respectively. None of the tested materials caused genotoxicity. PM
2.5 INDOOR displayed higher relative toxicity than PM
2.5 OUTDOOR under the studied conditions, that is, wintertime with reduced air exchange rates, high influence of indoor sources, and relatively low outdoor concentrations of PM. Reducing PM
2.5 INDOOR exposure requires reduction of both infiltration from outdoors and indoor-generated particles.

Department/s

  • Metalund
  • Centre for Healthy Indoor Environments
  • Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology
  • Applied Mass Spectrometry in Environmental Medicine
  • Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University
  • LTH Profile Area: Aerosols

Publishing year

2022-12-12

Language

English

Publication/Series

Indoor Air

Volume

32

Issue

12

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Environmental Sciences
  • Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Mice
  • Air Pollutants/analysis
  • Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Particle Size
  • Acute-Phase Reaction
  • Sweden
  • Particulate Matter/analysis
  • Pneumonia/etiology
  • aerosol, home, indoor/outdoor ratio, physicochemical characteristics, PM2.5, real-life exposure, toxicity

Status

Published

Project

  • Airborne particles in our homes: cocktail effects, chemical composition, physical characteristics and toxicity

Research group

  • Applied Mass Spectrometry in Environmental Medicine

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0905-6947